THE BALL – Arouca ‘threw himself’ in the Chamber: “Narcissistic, pedantic and authoritarian attitudes” (Arouca)

“With nice shock and anger that the Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda is aware of the content material of the assertion made in the present day, by the Municipality of Arouca.” This is how Arouca’s lengthy assertion, with 22 factors, started in response to the controversy this Wednesday (see accompanying information).

It is recalled that the Municipality of Arouca issued a press release saying that it was “pressured to name the GNR to the Municipal Stadium”, which is its property, “to chop the padlocks that stop entry to the parking of municipal infrastructure”, parking. which might be used as a car parking zone for Feira das Colheitas.

According to the metropolis council, these chargeable for Arouca have been «threatened» to lock the gates of the stadium, to stop entry, if the municipality doesn’t perform a few of the mandatory works, and the menace is positioned on follow. A scenario worthy of the «sturdy rejection» of the City Council, which in the final a part of the identical assertion gave an evidence of the contract for the lease of the stadium.

Now Arouca says that the communiqué of the City Council “voluntarily distorts the details reported there as a result of it makes dangerous concerns and imputations of the equity and consideration of the leaders of FC Arouca”.

“We are thus, towards our will, obliged to exit in public to elucidate the reality of the details”, reads the observe, recalling that “even when the municipality owns the stadium, it doesn’t have a bug -os possession of the rights of the proprietor, which is positioned in the proper to make use of the membership».

Arouca additionally accused the municipality of «lack of dialogue», made a chronology of occasions and defined his causes and additionally the query of the want for the works talked about in the communiqué of the city council.

And the final a part of the assertion is especially harsh: “We reiterate our anger at the narcissistic, pedantic and authoritarian attitudes of the municipality.”

Arouca’s assertion

It is with nice shock and anger that the Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda is aware of the content material of the assertion made in the present day, by the Municipality of Arouca, as a result of it voluntarily distorts the details reported there whereas making dangerous ones consideration and imputation of compatibility. and consideration of the leaders of FC Arouca.

Therefore, towards our will, we’re obliged to strategy the public to make clear the reality of the details.

1 – The events – FC AROUCA SDUQ Lda and the Municipality of Arouca – signed a contract for the proper to make use of the municipal stadium and its integral components, which embrace the parking space.

2 – In return, we pay a rental quantity for that use.

3- This contract is executed and our obligations are updated.

4 – Thus, the Municipality surrenders the use of the Municipal Stadium to Futebol Clube de Arouca, and, opposite to what was talked about in the unsuccessful Communiqué, though the Municipality is the proprietor of the identical, it’s not in full- os proprietary possession. rights, that are equally vested in the proper of use of the Club (FCA, SUDQ Lda.).

5- This doesn’t stop the Municipality from utilizing it for cultural, leisure and sports activities occasions, below the phrases and circumstances outlined in the lease settlement.

6 – The Municipality can not impose its use with out minimal dialogue or session with its “tenant”, as a result of we’re in a democratic state the place all rights, freedoms and ensures have to be revered.

7 – The Municipality limits itself to tell FC Arouca, that it’s going to maintain a live performance in the Stadium space, with out guaranteeing the guarding and safety of the space, and permitting entry to the loos and different services.

8 – Arouca instantly and in good religion communicated with the Municipality that the switch of that area isn’t potential, for causes associated to security and the planning of coaching and sport preparation with a view to our take part in the competitors in an expert method. in the Portuguese League.

9 – We are shocked by the lack of communication from the Municipality concerning the change of location of the occasion, however we’re positive that frequent sense will prevail.

10 – However, on the eve of the match between FC Arouca and Vitória de Guimarães, and with out prior discover, an organization got here to the stadium to arrange the live performance stage, and the membership instantly confirmed the its concern, with safety points. , which is with the danger that its set up might signify the reception of visiting followers and throughout the sport.

11 – Fortunately, the firm in query acknowledges the validity of our considerations and refuses to arrange the stage in that location, on the eve of a dangerous sport.

12 – Once once more, we reiterate to the Municipality that the use of the Stadium for the live performance will disturb the regular coaching and planning of the skilled soccer workforce, particularly since they’ve a scheduled sport to arrange in their stadium.

13 – After fixed insistence, we managed a gathering with some representatives of the Municipality, regretting, nonetheless, that our Excellency the President was not current, as a result of in truth, resulting from his consideration for our Football Club and its leaders, this case will definitely occur. did not occur.

14 – In that assembly, we undoubtedly and clearly defined, all the time in good religion, the causes that didn’t enable us to permit the occasion to be held at the Stadium.

15 – Convinced that the Municipality acknowledges the inconvenience and dangerous penalties of the occasion for the work and planning of the membership.

16 – Later, we realized about the change in the location of the live performance, which modified our religion in the frequent sense of our mayors.

17 – We occur to be shocked once more by the authoritarian imposition by the Municipality of the intention to make use of the automobile park of the stadium, ignoring the considerations and wants already proven by the membership, and the phrases of the contract for the switch of the stadium.

18 – Since it could possibly solely be utilized by the Municipality for sporting, cultural or leisure occasions, it’s not suitable with its use as a parking lot, in addition to ignoring the disturbances and conflicts that this use has in coaching and video games already scheduled. .

19 – We have main good folks, who obey the legislation and the obligations held by the contracts, and we all the time defend the want of the residing forces of the area to work collectively to reward our noble village and area.

20 – Therefore, we tried many instances to get the help of the Municipality of the investments and enhancements that proved mandatory in the Municipal Stadium (imposed by Liga Portugal, IPDJ and UEFA), which all the time obtained a unfavorable response.

21 – The Club ended, in the final two years, resulting from, itself, the efficiency of works budgeted for greater than € 100,000.00, safety of the Municipality below the phrases of the project contract.

22 – Now, the contract of the project of the stadium creates obligations for each events, and the Municipality, which is obliged to satisfy it, can not impose and eliminate it because it ought to, forgetting that it doesn’t eliminate the Stadium, as a result of identical as “rented”…

As for concerns about the equity and respectability of the habits of the leaders of the Futebol Clube de Arouca, we perceive that such unreasonable, unreasonable feedback and opposite to the opinion of the majority of Arouquense, says extra about who made them. for who they’re, it is over.

In truth, FC Arouca is now a nationally and internationally revered membership for its distinctive path to skilled soccer competitions, which has introduced so much to our village, largely due to its leaders and the cautious administration that executed, with few assets. with and with none help from the Municipality.

Being an excellent individual, respectful and respecting the legislation, not doing dangerous issues to the Municipality or the public treasury.

In view of the above, we reiterate our anger at the narcissistic, pedantic and authoritarian attitudes of the Municipality, culminating in the Communiqué to which we’re obliged to reply, as a result of a bit democratic spirit and frequent sense are sufficient for this basic the. scenario to keep away from.

Finally, we wish to take the alternative to request all Arouquense to get pleasure from the Harvest Fair in the very best manner.

The ‘Said’ Leaders


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.