THE BALL – Arouca responds to the Chamber: “Narcissistic, pedantic and authoritarian attitudes” (Arouca)

“With nice shock and anger that the Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda is aware of the content material of the assertion made in the present day, by the Municipality of Arouca.” This is how Arouca’s lengthy assertion, with 22 factors, started in response to the controversy this Wednesday (see accompanying information).

It is recalled that the Municipality of Arouca issued an announcement saying that it was “pressured to name the GNR to the Municipal Stadium”, which is its property, “to minimize the padlocks that stop entry to the parking of municipal infrastructure”, parking. which might be used as a parking zone for Feira das Colheitas.

According to the metropolis council, these chargeable for Arouca have been «threatened» to lock the gates of the stadium, to stop entry, if the municipality doesn’t perform a few of the obligatory works, and the menace is positioned on follow. A scenario worthy of the «sturdy rejection» of the City Council, which in the final a part of the identical assertion gave a proof of the contract for the lease of the stadium.

Now Arouca says that the communiqué of the City Council “voluntarily distorts the info reported there as a result of it makes unhealthy concerns and imputations of the equity and consideration of the leaders of FC Arouca”.

“We are thus, in opposition to our will, obliged to exit in public to clarify the fact of the info”, reads the notice, recalling that “even when the municipality owns the stadium, it doesn’t have a bug -os possession of the rights of the proprietor, which is positioned in the proper to use the membership».

Arouca additionally accused the municipality of «lack of dialogue», made a chronology of occasions and defined his causes and additionally the query of the want for the works talked about in the communiqué of the city council.

And the final a part of the assertion is especially harsh: “We reiterate our anger at the narcissistic, pedantic and authoritarian attitudes of the municipality.”

Arouca’s assertion

It is with nice shock and anger that the Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda is aware of the content material of the assertion made in the present day, by the Municipality of Arouca, as a result of it voluntarily distorts the info reported there whereas making unhealthy ones consideration and imputation of compatibility. and consideration of the leaders of FC Arouca.

Therefore, in opposition to our will, we’re obliged to strategy the public to make clear the fact of the info.

1 – The events – FC AROUCA SDUQ Lda and the Municipality of Arouca – signed a contract for the proper to use the municipal stadium and its integral elements, which embody the parking space.

2 – In return, we pay a rental quantity for that use.

3- This contract is executed and our obligations are up to date.

4 – Thus, the Municipality surrenders the use of the Municipal Stadium to Futebol Clube de Arouca, and, opposite to what was talked about in the unsuccessful Communiqué, though the Municipality is the proprietor of the identical, it isn’t in full- os proprietary possession. rights, that are equally vested in the proper of use of the Club (FCA, SUDQ Lda.).

5- This doesn’t stop the Municipality from utilizing it for cultural, leisure and sports activities occasions, below the phrases and situations outlined in the lease settlement.

6 – The Municipality can not impose its use with out minimal dialogue or session with its “tenant”, as a result of we’re in a democratic state the place all rights, freedoms and ensures have to be revered.

7 – The Municipality limits itself to inform FC Arouca, that it’s going to maintain a live performance in the Stadium space, with out guaranteeing the guarding and safety of the space, and permitting entry to the loos and different amenities.

8 – Arouca instantly and in good religion communicated with the Municipality that the switch of that area is just not doable, for causes associated to security and the planning of coaching and recreation preparation with a view to our take part in the competitors in knowledgeable method. in the Portuguese League.

9 – We are shocked by the lack of communication from the Municipality concerning the change of location of the occasion, however we’re positive that widespread sense will prevail.

10 – However, on the eve of the match between FC Arouca and Vitória de Guimarães, and with out prior discover, an organization got here to the stadium to arrange the live performance stage, and the membership instantly confirmed the its concern, with safety points. , which is with the danger that its set up might signify the reception of visiting followers and throughout the recreation.

11 – Fortunately, the firm in query acknowledges the validity of our issues and refuses to arrange the stage in that location, on the eve of a dangerous recreation.

12 – Once once more, we reiterate to the Municipality that the use of the Stadium for the live performance will disturb the regular coaching and planning of the skilled soccer crew, particularly since they’ve a scheduled recreation to put together of their stadium.

13 – After fixed insistence, we managed a gathering with some representatives of the Municipality, regretting, nevertheless, that our Excellency the President was not current, as a result of in actual fact, due to his consideration for our Football Club and its leaders, this case will definitely occur. did not occur.

14 – In that assembly, we undoubtedly and clearly defined, all the time in good religion, the causes that didn’t permit us to permit the occasion to be held at the Stadium.

15 – Convinced that the Municipality acknowledges the inconvenience and dangerous penalties of the occasion for the work and planning of the membership.

16 – Later, we discovered about the change in the location of the live performance, which modified our religion in the widespread sense of our mayors.

17 – We occur to be shocked once more by the authoritarian imposition by the Municipality of the intention to use the automobile park of the stadium, ignoring the issues and wants already proven by the membership, and the phrases of the contract for the switch of the stadium.

18 – Since it might probably solely be utilized by the Municipality for sporting, cultural or leisure occasions, it isn’t appropriate with its use as a carpark, in addition to ignoring the disturbances and conflicts that this use has in coaching and video games already scheduled. .

19 – We have main good folks, who obey the regulation and the obligations held by the contracts, and we all the time defend the want of the dwelling forces of the area to work collectively to reward our noble village and area.

20 – Therefore, we tried many instances to get the help of the Municipality of the investments and enhancements that proved obligatory in the Municipal Stadium (imposed by Liga Portugal, IPDJ and UEFA), which all the time obtained a adverse response.

21 – The Club ended, in the final two years, due to, itself, the efficiency of works budgeted for greater than € 100,000.00, safety of the Municipality below the phrases of the task contract.

22 – Now, the contract of the task of the stadium creates obligations for each events, and the Municipality, which is obliged to fulfill it, can not impose and get rid of it because it ought to, forgetting that it doesn’t get rid of the Stadium, as a result of identical as “rented”…

As for concerns about the equity and respectability of the conduct of the leaders of the Futebol Clube de Arouca, we perceive that such unreasonable, unreasonable feedback and opposite to the opinion of the majority of Arouquense, says extra about who made them. for who they’re, it is over.

In truth, FC Arouca is now a nationally and internationally revered membership for its distinctive path to skilled soccer competitions, which has introduced loads to our village, largely due to its leaders and the cautious administration that accomplished, with few assets. with and with none help from the Municipality.

Being particular person, respectful and respecting the regulation, not doing unhealthy issues to the Municipality or the public treasury.

In view of the above, we reiterate our anger at the narcissistic, pedantic and authoritarian attitudes of the Municipality, culminating in the Communiqué to which we’re obliged to reply, as a result of a bit of democratic spirit and widespread sense are sufficient for this basic the. scenario to keep away from.

Finally, we wish to take the alternative to request all Arouquense to take pleasure in the Harvest Fair in the absolute best approach.

The ‘Said’ Leaders


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.